$0
Free scan
See the score and top customer-path issues before creating an account or paying.
Alternative guide
Use synthetic monitoring for engineered flows. Use SiteLeak for self-serve lead-path evidence.
Checkly is strong when engineering teams need API checks, browser checks, Playwright-based synthetic monitoring, and check-as-code workflows. SiteLeak is intentionally smaller: it gives local businesses and agencies a scan-backed report for broken forms, booking links, phone CTAs, quote paths, order links, and mobile customer actions without asking them to write tests.
After the scan
Free preview first. Pay only when the evidence is useful.
Each page routes into the same self-serve path: scan the public site, review the strongest signals, then unlock the full repair packet or monitor the same paths.
$9 once
Full report
Unlock every affected URL, severity, evidence summary, fix note, and PDF-ready handoff.
$19/mo
Weekly monitoring
Rerun checks automatically and get alerted when forms, links, CTAs, or paths get worse.
Customer-path evidence this page checks
Public forms, booking links, phone actions, quote paths, order paths, cart paths, and mobile CTAs
Plain-language issue rows with affected URLs, severity, source evidence, fix notes, and retest steps
Self-serve scan and payment flow for business owners who do not want a developer workflow
Weekly monitoring that alerts on changed lead-path evidence
Public-page safety boundaries: no private targets, no form submissions, no booking creation
Developer monitoring versus business-path scanning
Synthetic monitoring can be ideal when a team owns scripted checks. SiteLeak is built for the owner or agency who wants the scan to infer public customer-path evidence automatically.
Where SiteLeak should stay narrow
SiteLeak does not try to become a check-as-code platform, API monitor, or engineering incident workflow. The value is a concrete report for public paths customers use to contact, book, request, order, or buy.
A lower-friction first purchase
The free scan proves whether SiteLeak found something useful. The $9 report unlocks the repair handoff, and the $19 weekly monitor watches the same domain after public site changes.
What this page helps you decide
Use this comparison when the buyer is weighing developer synthetic monitoring against a no-code lead-path scanner for business websites.
Practical fixes after the scan
Use SiteLeak findings to repair customer-path blockers before building more advanced synthetic checks.
Use Checkly-style synthetic workflows when a developer needs scripted paths, API validations, and technical alerting.
Use the $9 report to hand affected URLs and fix notes to a site editor without a custom test authoring step.
Use weekly monitoring when a business wants recurring path checks without maintaining scripts.
Evidence examples
conversion.no_contact_pathhigh
Service page has no obvious contact path
The public page lacks phone, email, contact, booking, quote, order, checkout, or form signals in the scanned evidence.
Fix: Add a clear customer action near the service content and retest the live page.
checkout.broken_quote_linkhigh
Quote request CTA returns an error
The public quote CTA resolves to a missing same-domain URL during sampled link checks.
Fix: Point the CTA to the active quote form or a working contact page and rerun the scan.
conversion.no_above_fold_ctamedium
Local service landing page hides the action a visitor came for
The page can be reached publicly, but the first mobile viewport does not expose the service request, call, booking, or contact action that matches the page intent.
Fix: Place the primary lead action near the top of the mobile layout and rerun the scan after the page-builder or template update is published.
How to choose
Use SiteLeak when
- The buyer wants a self-serve business report for broken public customer paths.
- The site owner or agency does not want to write or maintain synthetic scripts.
- The first purchase should be a low-friction report or weekly monitor for one public domain.
Use the other tool when
- Engineers need API checks, Playwright browser checks, check-as-code workflows, or high-control synthetic monitoring.
- The team needs technical alerting for backend, frontend, and global synthetic test coverage.
- A developer can define the exact user journey and maintain it as the product changes.
Limits to keep fair
- SiteLeak does not provide a full synthetic monitoring platform or custom script runner.
- Checkly can model complex technical flows that SiteLeak does not attempt to model.
- SiteLeak should be evaluated on public lead-path evidence, report handoff value, and low-friction monitoring.
Source context
Questions this scan can answer
Does SiteLeak run custom Playwright scripts?
No. SiteLeak uses its own scanner checks and browser evidence where available. It does not ask users to author Playwright scripts.
When should an engineering team choose Checkly?
Choose a synthetic monitoring platform when the team needs API checks, scripted browser checks, check-as-code workflows, or engineering alerting around technical systems.
When should a local business choose SiteLeak?
Choose SiteLeak when the problem is a public website path: forms, booking links, phone links, quote paths, order paths, mobile CTAs, and recurring evidence after site edits.