$0
Free scan
See the score and top customer-path issues before creating an account or paying.
Alternative guide
Use Better Stack for observability depth. Use SiteLeak for customer-path repair evidence.
Better Stack is a broader monitoring, incident, status page, real-user monitoring, and telemetry platform. SiteLeak is not trying to be an observability stack. It focuses on one commercial question for public business sites: can visitors still call, contact, book, request, order, or buy from the paths the site exposes?
After the scan
Free preview first. Pay only when the evidence is useful.
Each page routes into the same self-serve path: scan the public site, review the strongest signals, then unlock the full repair packet or monitor the same paths.
$9 once
Full report
Unlock every affected URL, severity, evidence summary, fix note, and PDF-ready handoff.
$19/mo
Weekly monitoring
Rerun checks automatically and get alerted when forms, links, CTAs, or paths get worse.
Customer-path evidence this page checks
Broken public customer paths: forms, booking links, phone actions, quote paths, order links, cart paths, and mobile CTAs
Issue evidence packaged for a site editor instead of an incident-response team
Simple free scan, $9 full report, and $19 weekly monitoring flow
Affected URL, severity, screenshot context where available, fix note, and retest step
No log ingestion, no infrastructure setup, no sales call, and no private-target scanning
Different buyer, different output
An observability platform is built for operational teams. SiteLeak is built for a business owner or agency who needs a concise repair packet for public pages.
Where SiteLeak avoids complexity
There is no log pipeline, on-call setup, incident workflow, or custom telemetry model. The product starts with a public scan and sells the evidence only when the preview finds something useful.
Why this can convert
A broad platform can be powerful but too much for a small local site. SiteLeak's job is smaller: prove the broken path, unlock the fix packet, and keep watching that same domain.
What this page helps you decide
Use this comparison when the buyer is deciding between a broad operational monitoring platform and a focused lead-path report for a public website.
Practical fixes after the scan
Use SiteLeak findings to repair broken customer-action paths before building a broader operational stack.
Use observability tooling when the team needs logs, metrics, incident handling, status pages, and responder workflows.
Use the $9 report when a site editor needs affected URLs, severity, evidence, and repair notes.
Use the $19 weekly monitor after fixing customer paths that are likely to change again.
Evidence examples
checkout.broken_order_linkhigh
Visible order action returns an error
The public order CTA is classified as a customer path and returns an error during sampled link checks.
Fix: Update the order destination or redirect to the active provider, then rerun the scan.
conversion.form_missing_contact_fieldmedium
Lead form has no clear contact field
The public form evidence does not identify an email, phone, name, message, or contact field.
Fix: Add and label a contact field so the business can follow up when a real request arrives.
monitoring.issue_worsenedhigh
Recurring scan sees a new customer-path blocker
A later monitoring run finds a high-severity issue that was not present in the previous baseline.
Fix: Review the affected URL, repair the changed link or widget, and rerun the scan to establish a clean baseline.
How to choose
Use SiteLeak when
- A business owner or agency needs a focused repair packet for broken public website paths.
- The goal is to catch contact, booking, quote, order, phone, form, and mobile CTA issues without observability setup.
- The purchase needs to stay self-serve with a free scan, low-cost report, and simple weekly monitoring.
Use the other tool when
- The team needs uptime monitoring, incident management, status pages, telemetry, logs, traces, or on-call workflows.
- The buyer is operational or engineering-led and wants a broader platform across systems.
- The monitoring problem includes infrastructure or application observability beyond public customer paths.
Limits to keep fair
- SiteLeak is not an observability, log, metrics, or incident-management platform.
- A broad platform can support operational workflows SiteLeak does not attempt to support.
- SiteLeak's useful lane is public lead-path evidence, report handoff, and recurring checks for business websites.
Source context
Questions this scan can answer
Does SiteLeak replace observability or incident management?
No. SiteLeak is a public website lead-path scanner and monitor. It does not provide logs, traces, metrics, on-call scheduling, or incident-management workflows.
When should a team use Better Stack?
Use it when monitoring, telemetry, incident response, status pages, real-user monitoring, or operational workflows are the main job.
When should a business use SiteLeak?
Use SiteLeak when the main concern is whether public website visitors can reach forms, booking links, phone CTAs, quote paths, order links, and mobile customer actions.